Posted by: Peter Della Penna | January 8, 2010

Cricket 101, Episode 7 – Batting Theory: Tennis

Cricket is like tennis. Think about it… Think about it…

Not mentioned in the video explicitly is the fact that hitting the ball in tennis is referred to as a shot or a stroke, just like it is in cricket. For example: In tennis, there is a backhand shot and forehand shot, which are known as groundstrokes. In cricket, there is the pull shot and the cut shot as well as the different types of drives, all of them known as strokes. There is also the volley in tennis and the volley or half-volley in cricket.

This is just the tip of the iceberg in my cricket batting theory. More to come in due time.

Last but not least, kudos to Suds for being a machine behind the camera, recording the session while standing at silly point. He took a miscued drive flush in the shoulder on the second cricket ball that was sent down for me to hit at 5:53 in the video. The badass barely flinched. Balls of steel Suds, balls of steel.

Posted by: Peter Della Penna | December 17, 2009

Cricket 101, Episode 6 – Traditions: The Boxing Day Test

What’s the best part about Christmas Day in America? The fact that halfway around the world in Australia it’s a day later, which means it’s Boxing Day and time for the Green and Gold to head out to the Melbourne Cricket Ground for the Boxing Day Test Match.

December 25th would not be complete in New Jersey without a Channel 9 broadcast on December 26th from Australia.

Posted by: Peter Della Penna | December 13, 2009

Cricket 101, Episode 5 – Jerseys

After a very long hiatus, Cricket 101 is back. The examination of batting theory will be coming up in one of the next few episodes. However, in today’s edition of 101, it’s time to breakdown the myth of what cricketers wear on the field. I know, I know. Cricket is a funny game played by men in white clothes, most of whom are wearing sweaters…

except that it’s not. Well, at least sometimes anyway.

So there you have it. Cricketers wear colored jerseys and clothes when they play in certain matches… just like any other sport.

Posted by: Peter Della Penna | December 9, 2009

Shane Warne vs. Tiger Woods

I got to thinking over the past couple of days, who becomes a hero for cheating on their wife and who becomes a villain. While Tiger Woods is seemingly being villified in the media, and rightfully so, I couldn’t help but wonder how one of the greatest cricketers of all time cemented his legendary status through similar “transgressions.”

Shane Warne: the man, the myth, the legend. The King of Spin became famous for bamboozling batsmen all over the world. Warney also gave the legend of Phar Lap a run for his money, developing a reputation for being a stallion off the field, with an assortment of fillies left in his wake.

Cricket's consummate ladies man - Shane Warne.

Warney is a big fan of the text message, as is Tiger. There hasn’t really been any info released on what Tiger’s SMS skills are, but I doubt they can match such suave Warney gems as:

“Where are you now… waiting for you, should I get dressed or stay naked, room 2011… Shane.”

or

“I would like to tie you up in the rain and watch you get so wet, water dripping all over your beautiful body … and then slowly come up and kiss you everywhere and make love to you. Yum!”

Warney celebrates another successful text message... er, wicket.

Then of course, there was the time Warney fired off this text – “Hey beautiful. I’m just talking to my kids. The back door’s open.” – intended for his mistress but sent instead to his ex-wife, who replied, “You loser, you sent the message to the wrong person.”

The list of Warney stories goes on, but somehow it only makes people love him more. The only other athlete I can think of who endeared himself to his fans for completely screwing up his life is Lawrence Taylor. No matter how much cocaine LT did, Giants fans including myself seemed to give him a pass, and that includes post-retirement.

So why do Warney and LT get cheered and Woods gets jeered? For me, it boils down to the fact that Warney and LT truly are just like the rest of us. Warney and LT are seemingly ordinary people with extraordinary talents. Warney had already been kicked out of the Australian academy before he was out of his teens and LT was allegedly a troublemaker in his youth as well.

Warney appeals to the umpires, and the ladies.

There is nothing ordinary about Woods and there never has been. There is nothing ordinary about the way his father raised him with a one-track mind on golf. There’s nothing ordinary about his career path and success. There’s certainly nothing ordinary about some of the things that have been written about him in the last 10 days either.

On a slightly separate tangent, people wonder about Tim Donaghy’s claims that David Stern manipulated the outcome of NBA playoff games in an attempt to gain the best matchups and ratings possible. The answer that is often thrown out in opposition to this claim is, “Why would David Stern risk destroying the entire reputation and history of the NBA to do something so stupid?” That’s funny. A lot of people are asking the same thing about Tiger Woods. “Why would he so brazenly have sex with as many women as he possibly could and risk losing his entire fortune?” Well, apparently he has. Of the many incredible things he supposedly said to these women, one of them is that he didn’t feel he was financially secure.

With Woods, as with Stern, anything is possible.

Posted by: Peter Della Penna | December 4, 2009

Batting theory unlocked

Thursday afternoon while on my long drive back from a trek across the southeast of the United States, I experienced a eureka moment. While I love to say many incredibly stupid things, this is far from it. In fact, I believe this could be the most revolutionary analysis of cricket in America. I have discovered the key to get Americans to understand batting theory in cricket. In turn, it will help Americans to understand cricket as a whole.

The complete earth-shattering explanation will be delivered in painstaking detail by the end of the year in the next episode(s) of Cricket 101. This truly will be the essence of Cricket 101, the basic understanding of cricket.

Posted by: Peter Della Penna | October 4, 2009

Don’t say India, say Indianapolis

My first article for Cricinfo, just published overnight. Check it out here.

Posted by: Peter Della Penna | October 2, 2009

Sanjay Manjrekar doesn’t know how to count

The scene of the crime: ESPN Star commentary box at the England vs. Australia Champions Trophy semifinal.

After England’s innings ends on a run out in 47.4 overs, Nick Knight starts going on about how England would have loved to bat out their overs to get at least 265.

Then Manjrekar chimes in, “So, 15 balls wasted here.”

2 overs plus 2 balls equals 14 deliveries Sanjay.

Older Posts »

Categories